Q&A Feedback and comment box

Youtube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/aGATHERING144

Radio Station -----> http://www.blogtalkradio.com/

OFFICIAL GOCC WEBSITE!!!! --->>>http://www.gatheringofchrist.org/

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery Part I: What Jewish Historians Say

Monday, 23 July 2012

Sunday...is the law of the Catholic Church alone...

“The Sunday...is purely a creation of the Catholic Church.”American Catholic Quarterly Review, January 1883.

“Sunday...is the law of the Catholic Church alone...” American Sentinel (Catholic), June 1893.

“Sunday is a Catholic institution and its claim to observance can be defended only on Catholic principles...From beginning to end of Scripture there is not a single passage that warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to the first.” Catholic Press, Sydney, Australia, August 1900.

“They [the Protestants] deem it their duty to keep the Sunday holy. Why? Because the Catholic Church tells them to do so. They have no other reason . . .The observance of Sunday thus comes to be an ecclesiastical law entirely distinct from the divine law of Sabbath observance . . . The author of the Sunday law . . . is the Catholic Church.” Ecclesiastical Review, February 1914.

Because this change occurred so long ago, people today have forgotten the facts of history. It is impossible to find the Biblical Sabbath via a pagan calendar; therefore, Saturday cannot be the true Sabbath. Not knowing this, Saturday sabbatarians have assumed that Saturday is the Sabbath from which worship was removed. It is true that there are plenty of quotes from Catholic writers that refer to Saturday as “Sabbath”:

“Of course the Catholic Church claims that the change (Saturday Sabbath to Sunday) was her act...And the act is a mark of her ecclesiastical authority in religious things.” H. F. Thomas, Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons.

“Sunday is founded, not of scripture, but on tradition, and is distinctly a Catholic institution. As there is no scripture for the transfer of the day of rest from the last to the first day of the week, Protestants ought to keep their Sabbath on Saturday and thus leave Catholics in full possession of Sunday.” Catholic Record, September 17, 1893.

“Protestantism, in discarding the authority of the [Roman Catholic] Church, has no good reasons for its Sunday theory, and ought logically to keep Saturday as the Sabbath.” John Gilmary Shea, American Catholic Quarterly Review, January 1883.

“Perhaps the boldest thing, the most revolutionary change the Church ever did, happened in the first century. The holy day, the Sabbath, was changed from Saturday to Sunday. ‘The day of the lord’ was chosen, not from any direction noted in the Scriptures, but from the Church’s sense of its own power...People who think that the Scriptures should be the sole authority, should logically become 7th Day [sic.] Adventists, and keep Saturday holy.” St. Catherine Church Sentinel, Algonac, Michigan, May 21, 1995.

“Is not every Christian obliged to sanctify Sunday and to abstain on that day from unnecessary servile work? Is not the observance of this law among the most prominent of our sacred duties? But you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify.” James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers (1917 edition), p. 72-73 (16th Edition, p. 111; 88th Edition, p. 89).

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

60 Days in Jail + A Fine for Home Bible Study!.............So it BEGINS!!

Gods & Godesses by Brother Ramah Charab

by Michael Jordan
pg. 355

YHWH יהוה
Origin: Judaic [Israel]. Creator god.
Known Period of Worship: circa 1200 B.C. until present day.
Synonyms: Yahweh; Jehovah.
Center(s) of Cult: Hebron, Jerusalem until 587 BC but subsequently throughout the Christian world.
Art Refererences: none extant.
Literary Sources: Vetus Testamentum; Qum' Ran manuscripts.

The creator god of the southern tribes of Israel headed by Levi and Benjamin. POSSIBLY A COPY OF THE EGYPTIAN DEITY ATUM(ATEN), INTRODUCED BY THE PHARAOH AMENHOTEP IV IN THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY B.C. The object of monolatrous but not necessarily monotheistic worship by the Hebrew settlers in Palestine. Arguably the first surviving concept of a truly universal deity.

Yhwh is the god who, ACCORDING TO TRADITION; was revealed to Moses on Mount Sinai(Mount Horeb) and who provided the Covenant, the ten tables of law. He is said to sit in judgment between two facing cherubim on the Mercy Seat which rested above the focal point of Israelite worship, the Ark of the Covenant(VT Exodus 25). Yhwh eventually superseded the northern god, El, to become supreme deity of Israel. During the period of Hellenic occupation, the sanctuary of Yhwh on Mount Gerizim in Samaria(northern kingdom) was re-dedicated to ZEUS.

The name Yhwh is an enigmatic "no name." It survived into Christian religion, though it appears regularly only in the Jerusalem Bible. Elsewhere, in English translation, it is now generally replaced by the term "Lord." "Jehovah" is a corruption introduced circa A.D. 1200-1300.

The Old Testament writings, particularly the Psalms, are littered with references indicating acceptance of many gods in the pantheon. Translators have substituted euphemisms such as "saints" and "holy men."

Although Yhwh is perceived in human form, he was not represented other than in romanticized Christian art. His presence is identified in jeWISH tradition only by the empty space of the Mercy Seat. He is wholly transcendent, without physical needs, and, according to Judao-Christian tradition, has no consort. This universal deity became known as ALLAH in Islamic Tradition.

From H1961; (the) self Existent or eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: - Jehovah, the Lord. Compare H3050, H3069.

pg. 352
YAH יהּ
Moon god. Egyptian. Yah may have been an import to Egypt brought by Semitic immigrants who based his profile on the Mesopotamian god SIN. He is mentioned largely from the twentieth century B.C. onward and is depicted in human form, but can also be represented by the falcon and the ibis.


Contracted for H3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name: - Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Cp. names in “-iah,” “-jah.”

From H1933 (in the sense of eagerly coveting and rushing upon; by implication of falling); desire; also ruin: - calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty, noisome, perverse thing, substance, very wickedness.

Hosea 2:16 And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.

ישׁעי = YA-SHA-I-YA
From H3467; saving; Jishi, the name of four Israelites: - Ishi.

From H1167 with pronominal suffix; my master; Baali, a symbolical name of Jehovah: - Baali.

Hosea 2:17 For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name

YHWH = JHVH = LORD = THE NAMES OF BAALIM...its time for our people to put down the blasphemous names of YHWH & YAH, doesnt matter what variation you use by inserting vowel sounds, there are no E, O, or U sounds in the True & Pure Hebrew Language, excuses are running out to keep using the blasphemous YIDDISH tongue and the names of the gods of the jeWISH edomites!!!

Exodus 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the Most High thy Power in vain; for the Most High will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

Ezekiel 39:7 So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the Most High, the Holy One in Israel.


The Lost Name of God

by Texxe Mars
pg. 54

The Lost Name of God

The Blue Lodge Masons, encompassing the first three degrees of Masonry, are
instructed that they are seeking the Lost Word or the Lost Name of God...It isn't until
they reach the level of Royal Arch Masonry (seventh degree, York Rite) that they
discover that the Lost Name of God wasn't lost after all. It's at this level that they
learn the sacred name of Masonry's God.

They find that the sacred name of (the Masonic) God is composed of three names
representing the three identities of God. It is so sacred it takes three Royal Arch
Masons to be able to speak it.. Jahbuhlun. The three Masons grip hands high and low
and chant, "Jah-buh-lun, Jah-buh-lun, Jah-buh-lun, Je-hov-ah." The name Jahbuhlun
has three syllables representing a composite God made up of three subordinate
deities. The Masonic material identifies the three as Yah (or Yahweh), Baal, and
Osiris. Logically, the name should be spelled Yah-Baal-On, but Duncan's Masonic
Ritual and Monitor admits that over the years the spelling has been "corrupted" by
Freemasonry until it reached its current form.1

Decker correctly asserts that, "What these men are doing is worshipping a demon
god so far removed from the real God that this worship must surely defile the
holiness of God and guarantee those who pronounce that name in such a ceremony
a swift ride to Hell..."2

pg. 56
So we see that the Mason's newfound "God," Jahbuhlun (Jah-Baal-On), is a rigid
taskmaster who does not look kindly on traitors and blabbers. It was the Canaanite
god Baal, of course, to whom the backslidden Jews and pagans sacrificed their
children in the fire. You'll recall that the prophet Elijah brought the message of God's
judgement against those who worshipped bloodthirsty Baal, who, in reality, is
merely an idolatrous representation of Satan. Yes, Baal is the devil.

To attempt in vain to combine the name of the true God with that of false gods like
Baal and On is particularly evil and grievous to the true God in heaven. Yet, the
Mason does exactly this with Jahbuhlun and then compounds his grave error by
adopting as one of his chief logos the sign of the double-headed eagle (symbolizing one
body of God, two heads!)

pg. 57
"I Am that I Am," the Mason Proclaims

Equally blasphemous is that in the lecture on the seventh, or Royal Arch Degree, of
the York Rite, the Mason initiated is asked the question, "Are you a Royal Arch
Mason?" His answer is required to be: "I am that I am."8

In other words, in this degree's ritual the Mason has not only acknowledged that
the devil, in the guise of Jahbuhlun, is his sacred Lord, but he now is declaring that
he, himself, a mere man, is the great I am! In other words, he is saying, "I am God!"

Uncovering the Hidden Hand
Now you see why I entitled this chapter, "The Hidden Hand of the Men of Jahbuhlun."

In the early degrees, the Mason is told that the name of God has been lost. He's even
told that he should use a substitute name for God, MAHABONE. But later, after he's
swallowed whole the rotten fabric of degree ritual after degree ritual, the
bamboozled and propagandized fellow is finally told that the one he is to worship
goes by the name Jahbuhlun and that he is now ready to declare himself, a man, as the
great I AM.

Obviously, the Illuminati's Masonic elite do not want the general public to know
these terrible things. After all, incredibly, Freemasonry's public image is that it is
some kind of "Christian" group. So, the pretense must be maintained and the secrets
buttoned up from the "profane and vulgar" masses (you and me, dear reader).
Therefore, the name of the horrible god whom the
Masons worship must stay hidden.

The name and identity of the hidden god
must be concealed at all costs, and thus an
appropriate hand sign has been devised to
represent this grotesque coverup: the Sign of the
Hidden Hand.

How to Perform the Sign

Figure 34 shown here is taken directly from
Duncan's Masonic Ritual and Monitor (3rd Edition).
It pictures the Royal Arch Mason performing the
magical Sign of the Master of the Second Veil, which
I informally and more informatively call here the
Sign of the Hidden Hand of the Men of Jahbuhlun.
According to Duncan's the candidate presents
this sign when he is approached by three
sojourners from Babylon. Their objective: Rebuild
the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem and
eventually establish a world empire of the Jews.

pg. 58
In his teaching course on Ancient Masonry, C.C. Zain of The Brotherhood of Light
explains that the ritual for this degree requires a keen understanding of astrology.
But, its performance is said to be derived from a passage in the scriptures. "The sign
is made," writes Zain, "by thrusting the hand into the bosom and again drawing it
out."9 The official Masonic explanation for this sign—a myth intended to divert the
profane from the truth — is that it refers to the fourth chapter of Exodus in the Holy
Bible: "And the Lord said unto Moses, put now thine hand into thy bosom; and he
put his hand into his bosom; and when he took it out, behold his hand was leprous
as snow."

Leprous, indeed, is the hand of the Mason who vainly seeks to hide and coverup
his fides oath of allegiance to Jahbuhlun, his sacred god. But, believe me, there is no
relationship of the Mason to Moses, a prophet of God who loyally worshipped the
true I AM, the God who reigns for all eternity in heaven.

Exodus 3:13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The Power of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?
Exo 3:14 And the Most High said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
Exo 3:15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The the Most High Power of your fathers, the Power of Abraham, the Power of Isaac, and the Power of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name FOR EVER, and this is my MEMORIAL unto all generations.


Isaiah 47:10 For thou hast trusted in thy wickedness: thou hast said, None seeth me. Thy wisdom and thy knowledge, it hath perverted thee; and thou hast said in thine heart, I AM, and none else beside me.

From H1961; (the) self Existent or eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: - Jehovah, the Lord. Compare H3050, H3069.


Contracted for H3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name: - Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Cp. names in “-iah,” “-jah.”

From H1933 (in the sense of eagerly coveting and rushing upon; by implication of falling); desire; also ruin: - calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty, noisome, perverse thing, substance, very wickedness.

Hosea 2:16 And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.

ישׁעי = YA-SHA-I-YA
From H3467; saving; Jishi, the name of four Israelites: - Ishi.

From H1167 with pronominal suffix; my master; Baali, a symbolical name of Jehovah: - Baali.

Hosea 2:17 For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name.

Shalom and blessings Brothers and Sisters

Shalom and blessings Brothers and Sisters,

We have sort to create an interactive and user-friendly information page that will serve as a learning tool to help the masses understand the mysteries of the bible and its true meaning in these last days. We exalt The Most High God who sent Moses to deliver the Israelites from oppression and sent his dear Son “The anointed Messiah” to free us from the curse, and we do believe The Savior will save us in these last days in which the bible calls “Jacob’s Trouble”. You will learn mysteries hidden for ages and generations and with a solid scripture base, you will be able to build a foundation of truth in a world filled with lies. You will learn how to unlock these mysteries along with obtaining answers to questions such as:

Has the Bible been tampered with?

How can I understand the Bible without Religious influence?

What is the true name of God?

Who is behind modern day theology?

What was the original Language?

Why did God allow slavery and who are the children of Slaves according to the Bible?

Why did the Jewish Powers and Christians finance Slavery?

Why our jails are filled with Minorities?

What will happen to America?

Is God against our modern Day Governments?

What will happen when America and Israel attack Iran?

These questions as well as many others will be answered through this venue and we encourage you to share this information with your friends and family. Let us stand as a vessels of truth with the Children of Zion and trample the head of the Serpent. Become a member and join the international Bible study to spread this truth at once all over the world!

Matthew 24:14…“And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.”


Tuesday, 10 July 2012

Why is Sunday your main day of worship ? {Revised}

Yes we should PRAISE The most High power every day. But The Most High never said to make the main day of worship SUN day. Our Heavenly Power sanctified (to make holy) the Seventh Day.The word Sunday isn't even in the Bible.

Question: Why is the first day of the week called SUN day and not SON day?

Lets take a look at the word SUN day.

Etymology ( from "Wikipedia") "The ( known to be) Jew-ish source"..lol

A depiction of Máni, the personified moon, and his sister Sól, the personified sun, from Norse mythology (1895) by Lorenz Frølich.

The English noun Sunday derived sometime before 1250 from sunedai, which itself developed from Old English (before 700) Sunnandæg (literally meaning "sun's day"), which is cognate to other Germanic languages, including Old Frisian sunnandei, Old Saxon sunnundag, Middle Dutch sonnendach (modern Dutch zondag), Old High German sunnun tag (modern German Sonntag), and Old Norse sunnudagr (Danish and Norwegian søndag, and Swedish söndag). The Germanic term is a Germanic interpretation of Latin dies solis ("day of the sun"), which is a translation of the Greek heméra helíou.[3] The p-Celtic Welsh language also translates the Latin "day of the sun" as dydd Sul.


Ok so, i gather the truth to be this. What you would call "Sunday" now (in present day), Wouldn't be the same SUN day back then. Obviously right? So, How did the first day of the week go from SUN day to Sunday?

That should bother you, considering that The word Sunday is not found in the Bible. It's none other than TRADITION, not biblical.

Who named the days of the week anyway. Look it up!! it's not hard to do. You should want to know.

Days of the week were numbered in the Bible not named, other than WHAT DAY?

That's right the 7th day, the Sabbath.

That is if you read and believe in the same Bible and heavenly father that i do.

Let's Get it!! King James Version. (You try and find A day that is named in the Bible)

Genesis 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made;

and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.

"It says Seventh day twice; He stopped working and rested..ok, cont...

Genesis 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it (to set apart/holy):

because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

Hold up, He blessed and sanctified what day? SUN day? or The Sabbath? Precept upon precept now , ok. I'm not going to just speak one scripture and call it a day.

Wait...... did i just call the 7th day , Sabbath? Let's see why!! Lets read some LAW!!

Exodus 20:1-11

1. And God spake all these words, saying,

2. I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

3. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

4. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

5. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

6. And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

7. Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.


Hold on, Remember what day ? SUN day? Or the 7th day?

(notice how i refer to the sabbath day as the 7th day)

9. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:

10. But the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God:

###Now Hold UP!!!, What day is the The sabbath? What day is the 7th? Where's SUN day at.... ?" cont...

11. For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is,

and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / (7) { Days of the week }

S / M/ T / W/ Th/ F/ S { Names given to the days of the week}

Notice that none of the names given to any day by the Pagans is the SABBATH!!

As you can see SUN day is the First day of the week.

Let's look at a calendar to back up what has been illustrated.

Now let's look at a very Key scripture ! !

Mat 28:1 (In) the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the (first day) of the week,

came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.

Mat 28:6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.

So Still being IN the sabbath, but AT the END of it (Not yet over) it BEGAN to dawn towards the Fisrt day.

Christ was not there.

This shows TWO things. The first thing it shows it that The Sabbath IS NOT THE FIRST DAY of the Week, Period. The second thing it shows is that Christ DID NOT RISE ON SUN day.

Moving right along here.....

Most Christian church's main day of worship is on Easter SUN day. Where in the Bible does it say that Christ Rose on "Easter Sunday" ? Where does it say to Acknowledge Chocolate and bunny rabbits as symbolism for Christ's passover?Doesn't make sense does it ? Do some research on Easter. It's PAGAN tradition (right along with "Sun day" worship), period. Why Would your Pastors teach this mess? And Again, why do you Worship on SUN day?

Exo 31:13 Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily my sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the LORD that doth sanctify you.

Exo 31:14 Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it is holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people.

Exo 31:15 Six days may work be done; but in the seventh is the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.

Exo 31:16 Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the sabbath, to observe the sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant.

Exo 31:17 It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.

So we see that the Sabbath is to be observed for a Perpetual covenant and is a sign between us and the Most High forever. Let's get another scripture.

Ezekiel 20:16 Because they despised my judgments, and walked not in my statutes, butpolluted my sabbaths: for their heart went after their idols.

Ezekiel 20:19-21

19 I am the LORD your God; walk in my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them;

20 And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.

21 Notwithstanding the children rebelled against me: they walked not in my statutes, neither kept my judgments to do them, which if a man do, he shall even live in them;they polluted my sabbaths: then I said, I would pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger against them in the wilderness.

Again we see that the Sabbath is a sign between the Most high and us. The sabbath is VERY important and our forefathers went astray, despised his judgments, walked NOT in his statues, polluted the sabbath(s) and went after Idols. And because of this the most high was angry with us and we payed for it and still are. We should learn from this, take heed and turn back to the Most Hgh's laws. Let's go to the new testament.

1Co 10:5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

1Co 10:6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.


1Co 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.

1Co 10:12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.

Heb 3:12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.

Israel had received instruction from AHAYAH, but did not trust him enough to obey his divine principle(s). And through unbelief, naturally comes disobedience. And as a result of their disobedience, he swore to them that they would never enter (his rest).

Heb 3:18 And to whom sware he that they should not enter into (his rest), but to them that believed not?

So, they were not allowed to enter Canaan (Israel), we are told, because of their unbelief.

Heb 3:19 So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.

The barriers to entering AHAYAH's rest are unbelief and disobedience. Therefore we must exhort one another to guard against having a hardened heart against the Most High which leads to turning away from AHAYAH's law(s).

Heb 4:1 Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into (his rest), any of you should seem to come short of it.

We must be careful not to disobey AHAYAH's commandments as our forefathers (the Israelites) did and thereby forfeit the promise of entering (his rest).

Entering into "his eternal rest" is to begin TODAY by obeying his command to join him in his Seventh-day rest which he established at creation; which this "rest" is further explained.

Heb 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.

Heb 4:4 For he spake in a certain place (Gen 2:2-3) of the seventh day on this wise, AndGod did rest the seventh day from all his works.

Heb 4:5 And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.

To those who believe and obey AHAYAH, the Seventh-day Sabbath is that rest which the Most High is offering as a precursor to his eternal rest, or entrance into the coming kingdom. This is the command of AHAYAH which all believers are encouraged not to disobey.

The Seventh-day Sabbath is a pleasant reflection of the Eternal rest in which believers shall rejoice. But the way to enter into the eternal rest of the kingdom is to trust in him "today" and enter now into his Seventh-day Sabbath rest.

The two rests go hand in hand. Those who will be entering into the promised eternal rest will also obediently enter into AHAYAH's Sabbath rest on the seventh day of every week, as an act of showing faith in that promised eternal rest.

Heb 4:6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:


Heb 4:9 There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God.

Heb 4:10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.

Heb 4:11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

Keeping the laws of the Most High is an act of faith and love, for both require an action (works). When we keep in mind the purpose of the Sabbath day, it all begins to become clear. The Sabbath is that time the Creator has set aside to worship the Creator ("and AHAYAH blessed the seventh day and set it apart") (Gen 2:2). So, whoever loves the Most High will worship him on his set apart day.

Exo 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.

Psa 30:4 Sing unto the LORD, O ye saints of his, and give thanks at the remembrance of his holiness.

These pastors are not bringing this rest to our rememberance. They are teaching against this and instead are teaching the commandments of men and that teh LAWS are done away.

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men,

after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

What scripture tells us to go into a building ( On SUN day) in order to receive "Christ"?

You won't find one....

So why do we do it? Its very simple, it's Tradition of Men. Your parents did it because (most likely)

their parents did it or we just follow along with other MEN.

Lets see what the scriptures say about all this !!!!!!

1 Corinthians 3:16-20

Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.

19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

So we are the temple in which The Most High's spirit dwells in. How do we defile the temple? We would have to simply let satan in and deceive us!

2 Thessalonians 2:3-4

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

4 (KEY VERSE) Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

( satan wants to sit in his temple) which is US.

In verse 3 it says "let no man deceive you". How do we let other deceive us? By simply not READING for ourselves. Instead we go to a so called "church" and rely on some MAN to tell us things.

JUST READ! Did you notice how i said "so called" church. We are about to get to that right now!

We just read that the temple is US!

Acts 7:48-49

Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,

49 Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest?

Acts 17:24-25

God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth,dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;

Matthew 18:20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name,

there am I in the midst of them.

SO, you have to acknowledge that not only did The most high rest on the Sabbath, he blessed it.

SO should you!!!This is The Most High's Law and we shall not adhere from it.

SO why do most people worship on SUNday? Not the sabbath? Maybe Satan has more power than we think.

If you look up the word sabbath you'll see that it is Observed by the Jews on Saturday and by most Christians on SUN day and Muslims on Friday. First of all most Christian churches don't even acknowledge or mention the word Sabbath. 2ndly, In the Christian Bible The most high says the sabbath is the 7th day. Keep it HOLY.

When does a day end and a new one begin?
Does a new day start at 12 mnidnight (witches hour)?
What's the difference between 11:59 p.m. and 12:00 a.m.?
Does a new day begin at the rising of the sun?

Let's go to the Bible for this answer.

At creation, The Most High established the method by which time would be measured for us here on the earth.

Gen 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

Gen 1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

Gen 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

Gen 1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

Gen 1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

The two great lights are, of course, the sun in our solar system and the moon which circles the earth. These two lights provide light upon the earth, and separate day from night. When the sun rises in the east, bringing forth abundant light, it is "day light". Then after it sets in the west and mostly darkness advances, it is night. It's not complicated at all. One only needs to observe what The Most High has established.

But notice that in verse 19 it says the EVENING and the MORNING were the fourth day and how the EVENING came FIRST. That's because when the sun goes down a day has ended and a new one begins.

The Sabbath is from Friday sundown until Saturday sundown, which is the seventh day.

So some one is lying and it's not the Bible. So, why do the pastors not observe and teach this? And why do they not acknowledge and teach his LAW(s)?

And if it's not the Most High Power's law that they teach, could it be of Satan's laws and doctrine? I think it's worth a little bit of FAITH to question your own faith in the Most High. I did. So who gave The Romans under the Nicene Creed during Constantine the permission to change time and law? Not the Most High. Could it be Satan? Would you agree that any power that is opposed to The most High Father is of Satan? Any person rebellious of Our father is Evil. Isn't evil of Satan? So there are many Anti-Christs.

So as i have said b4, people fail to realize just how much power satan has.

He is the Father of lies, so why would he tell you the truth?

This Kingdom/world belongs to satan, but not the kingdom coming

Matthew 12:26 And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself;

how shall then his kingdom stand?

Mat 4:8 Again, the devil taketh him (CHRIST) up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;

Mat 4:9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
How did satan have the power to give these things if he wasn't the ruler or god of these things ?

THE WORLD IS WICKED and was given to the wicked

Job 9:24 The earth is given into the hand of the wicked: he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?

James 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God?

whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.

1 john 2:15-16 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world,

the love of the Father is not in him.

16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.


John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.

He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.

When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High,

and shall wear out the saints of the most High,and think to change times and laws:

and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

Isaiah 14:12-16

12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground,

which didst weaken the nations!

13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come,

even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

2 Corinthians 11:13-15

13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

1 John 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: becausemany false prophets are gone out into the world.

Matthew 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders;

insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Christ is come in the flesh is not of God:

and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come;

and even now already is it in the world.

2 John 1:7

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Christ is come in the flesh.

This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

Rev 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not,

but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

People are so blinded and being deceived because they aren't reading the Bible for themselves and instead are just taking someones word for it.
And we can't always blame satan for our own ignorance. Satan is the great deceiver, but people also are deceiving themselves. We are responsible and will be held accountable for educating ourselves in the scriptures.

Time after time i hear folks saying that it doesn't matter what day i worship.

Well, until the Most High says that we should honor traditions of man

and not follow his laws and statutes, Your wrong.

So, we see that the Most High sanctified and blessed the Sabbath. So should we!!

Question: Did they keep the sabbath after christ?

Of Course they did, so should we.

Act 18:4 And he (Paul) reasoned in the synagogue (every sabbath), and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.

Act 13:14-15

But when they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch in Pisidia,

and went into the synagogue (on the sabbath day), and sat down.

15 And after the (reading of the law and the prophets) the rulers of the synagogue sent unto them, saying, Ye men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say on.

Act 13:42 And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the (next sabbath).

Act 13:43 Now when the congregation was broken up, many of the Jews and religious proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas: who, speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God.

Act 13:44 And the (next sabbath) day came (almost the whole city) together to hear the word of God.

Act 16:12 And on the (Sabbath day), we went outside the gate to a riverside,

where we were supposing that there would be a place of prayer;

and we sat down and began speaking to the women who had assembled.

Question: Is Christ a sinner? NO!! Did Christ Keep the Law? Of Course he did?

Christ Kept the Sabbath and the laws Because it was sin not to and christ has NO SIN.

1Jn 3:4-10 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law:

for sin is the transgression of the law.

5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.

6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.

7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.

8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning.

For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him:

and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil:

whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

The law itself was not able to forgive us of our sins. Sacrificing animals would only cover up our trespasses. And if you sinned a sin worthy of the death penalty, there was no room for repentance. Through Christ are past sins have been forgiven and are no longer debt unto us which allows us opportunity for repentance. Therefore under grace, WE FOLLOW CHRIST AND THE LAW..

Christ said:

Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets:

I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

So Christ said Don't let it even come into your mind that he came to destroy the law.

If anything he magnified it.

Joh 6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.

Mat 9:13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Luk 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying,

Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

Luk 10:26 He ( Christ) said unto him, (What is written in the law)? how readest thou?

Luk 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart,

and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

Luk 10:28 And he ( christ) said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

Let's see Christ keeping & Teaching on the sabbath.

Luk 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his (custom was)

he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read.

Luk 4:31 And came down to Capernaum, a city of Galilee, and taught them on the sabbath days.

Mar 1:21 And they went into Capernaum; and straightway on the sabbath day he entered into the synagogue, and taught.

Mat 12:8,12 For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.

12 How much then is a man better than a sheep?

Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days.

Exo 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.

Exo 20:10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God:

We all need a council or church to fellowship in Christ, but not on no SUN day.

How about on the Most High's Most High day.

Oh and last thing!! Don't let satan get the best of you~

Have you been deceived?

Does the word "Jesus" stem from Satan ?

Could Satan trick us into thinking that "Jesus" was Christ's real name ?

What and who does the name "Jesus" really represent ?

Would you pray to satan if you found out that one of his names is Jesus?

Are these wicked questions ? Or do they deserve consideration?

Christ was a Hebrew, therefore he would has a hebrew name.
Names have meanings and Christ's name means SAVIOUR.
The ORIGINAL 1611 King James Version (KJV) of the bible does not use Jesus.
The name used in the 1611 version is Iesus.
The Name Jesus/Iesus doesn't translate to mean saviour.
The greek word for Saviour is Soter. But Christ wasn't Greek.
The name Jesus came into existence approximately 19 years after the 1611 translation
The Letter "J" didn't come into wide spread usage until after the year 1630 A.D.
There isn't a letter "J", "J" equivalent or "J" sound in the Hebrew, Latin or Greek languages.
The Letter "J" is one of the newest letters to the English Alphabet.
2000 years ago there was not a Israelite man on earth named JESUS.
2000 years ago there was no place on earth called Jerusalem nor was there a god name Jehovah or a people called Jews.
The name Jesus is approximately 378 years old. The new testament writings are over 2000 years old.
The name Jesus is from the Greek Iesus, which is derived from a Greek goddess. It's also connected to the Greek god Zeus.
In Spanish the name Jesus is pronounce Hey-ZEUS

And for the record This is NOT CHRIST! WAKE-UP!

Be blessed,

Prince Israel ~ Anah Ra'ah

Monday, 9 July 2012

33TV Twisted Revren - Not Everyone (Music Video)

The President who told the truth!


This video contains one of the most awesome, inspiring and truthful speeches ever given by a president.

This very speech must have caused a lot of panic among the higher echelons of the elite. Kennedy had been in office for only 3 months and he was already taking unprecedented steps to empower ordinary people.

Kennedy did more for civil rights than any other president since Abraham Lincoln. Kennedy was a big supporter of the constitution, he was against the tyranny of big government. He wanted to withdraw US troops from Vietnam.

He wanted to abolish the CIA and Federal Reserve, and he warned us of criminal elements within the establishment who wanted to cease an opportunity to restrict peoples freedoms.

He urged the press to be more open and to fulfill its obligation to inform the American people about pertinent facts. And on top of that he spoke openly and candidly about the dangers of secret societies and their influence over the way government works. So is it any wonder that he was dramatically silenced only two years after making this epic speech?

For this video I have included the main parts of JFK’s speech, where he warns us about the dangers of secret societies.

It seems that Kennedy wanted to blow the whistle when he found out about the true scale of corruption within the establishment and how freemasonry and other secret societies play an integral part in this corrupt agenda.

It also seems that Kennedy wanted to speak out about the closed and secretive nature of organisations like the freemasons, especially at the higher levels. And it is only when a freemason reaches the higher levels that he can gain a fuller understanding of the kind of organisation he is part of.

Freemasonry also has its own set of rules, oaths, allegiances and rituals that are considered higher in importance than the ordinary code of conduct that we ordinary people live by. And the higher up you go in freemasonry, the more strange and daring the initiation rituals become; this is a hallmark of the way criminal gangs operate. Remember, just because someone wears a suit and a tie, that doesnt necessarily make them a better person than the mugger in the alley with the baseball bat.

The Entire John F Kennedy ‘Secret Society’ Speech Uncut with Subtitles and Transcript 

This 20 minute speech is completely unedited and shows the speech in true context of the Secret Society reference.

President Kennedy speaks at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York City before the American Newspaper Publishers Association. Kennedy asks the press for their cooperation in fighting Communism by applying the same standards for publishing sensitive materials in the current Cold War that they would apply in an officially declared war.

This transcript contains the published text of the speech, not the actual words spoken. There may be slight differences between the transcript and the audio/video content

Full Transcript

The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961

President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City
April 27, 1961

Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:
I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.
You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.
You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.
We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the “lousiest petty bourgeois cheating.”
But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.
If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.

I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight “The President and the Press.” Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded “The President Versus the Press.” But those are not my sentiments tonight.

It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.

Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.

Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.

If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.

On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.

It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one’s golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.

My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future–for reducing this threat or living with it–there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security–a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President–two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.


The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions–by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said–and your newspapers have constantly said–that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of the national security?” And I hope that every group in America–unions and businessmen and public officials at every level– will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations. Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.


It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers–I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news–for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security–and we intend to do it.


It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.




Obamacare, The Great Swindle!

Now that Obamacare has been ruled a tax by the U.S. Supreme Court, reality is starting to sink in for all those who emotionally supported it. Promoted as a way to provide either free health care or low-cost health care to the masses, the sobering reality is that under Obamacare, health insurance prices keep rising, not falling. That’s no surprise, of course, since the Obamacare legislation was practically written by the health insurance companies, and they sure didn’t put their weight behind a sweeping new law that would earn them less profit.

In an era when the so-called “99%” are sick and tired of being exploited by the one percent who control everything, they just handed their medical futures over to precisely the one percent who skillfully monopolize the conventional health care system!

Obamacare is, at every level, a huge victory for the one percent.

A costly new tax on the middle class

By the year 2016, the Obamacare “penalty” tax will reach roughly $2,000 per year for a two-person household. According to Stephen Moore of the Wall Street Journal, 75% of the financial burden of Obamacare’s new taxes will fall onto Americans making less than $120,000 a year (http://www.humanevents.com/2012/06/30/wsj-chief-economist-75-of-obama…). The great Middle Class, in other words, will bear this new tax more than anyone else.

In effect, what has really happened here is a great swindle: Obama got the middle class to support his legislation by promising it was NOT a tax, and by promising it would LOWER health insurance costs. In reality, however, it RAISES health insurance costs, it IS a tax, and the majority of that tax burden falls squarely on the very same middle-class voters who put Obama into office under false pretenses. That’s a swindle, by any definition.

Not surprisingly, this realization doesn’t sit well with many middle class taxpayers. While the original emotional appeal of Obamacare was nicely packaged and seductively marketed to the masses, the sobering, post-honeymoon reality slaps us all in the face like a wet fish: Smack! This thing is another huge tax increase on the working class! And on top of that, it gives the IRS scary new powers to pry into our private finances. How did you all think compliance with Obamacare was going to be enforced, anyway? It’s going to empower the IRS with even more agents!

Government monopoly for Big Pharma

Even worse than the trillions in new taxes and the IRS spy grid that’s now being set up to monitor compliance with Obamacare, there’s also the sobering fact that Obamacare never even attempted to give consumers a free choice in their health care providers. There’s no coverage of naturopathic medicine, herbal medicine, acupuncture or nutritional therapies. The entire law is written around — and for — Big Pharma and the conventional “sick care” industry that’s best described as a “medical racket.”

Thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, we don’t even have a chance to opt out of this corrupt, failed system of patented chemical medications and overpriced surgical procedures. Now, we are forced to hand over our hard-earned money to the very same medical system that we already know is responsible for killing over 750,000 Americans a year. It’s called “iatrogenic death,” and it means death by health care.

So not only are we being chemically abused and medically enslaved in America, we are now financially forced to pay for the privilege of being raked over the coals by the medical establishment. It makes you wonder… where is the “care” in Obamacare?

But wait, there’s more! From this position of being coerced by the government to pay for a system of medicine you don’t even want, it’s not much of a leap to being coerced to undergo medical procedures you don’t want, either.

How Obamacare will lead to mandatory vaccinations for everyone

Forced vaccinations — for adults! — are on the way, friends. And here’s why: Once everybody is “in the system” of mandatory health care, we will begin to hear arguments like this:

“Anyone who refuses to get vaccinated against influenza is thereby at risk of being an influenza carrier and infecting other people, thus increasing health care costs for us all. To save money, government must force everyone to get vaccinated!”

It’s a false argument, of course, but it will be used to literally line people up at courthouses (with the threat of arrest and jail time) and force them all to be vaccinated against their will.

The same false logic can be used to force people to undergo chemotherapy, take AIDS drugs, undergo coronary bypass surgery or be subjected to almost any medical procedure deemed “necessary” by the government. In the realm of mental health and psychiatry, this opens up a Pandora’s Box of exploitation of patients for the purpose of raking in record profits for the criminally-operated psychiatric drug industry.

Such is the inevitable abuse of monopolistic market practices enforced by a corrupt government that serves the interests of its corporate masters: Once the sick care industry has this monopoly and can force everyone to participate, they will exploit that advantage to its fullest profiteering capacity.

Remember: It is the dream of every corporation to dominate the world. Obamacare just gave Big Pharma and the other sick care giants huge monopolistic cheats to pursue precisely that goal.

Sober up, America

In a time when consumers are increasingly demanding transparency, free choice and the ability to shop around for competitive bargains, Obamacare codifies secrecy, mandatory compliance and monopolistic practices.

Maybe it’s time to sober up and take an honest look at what Obamacare really is instead of what Obama promised it would be. People bought into the dream, but what they actually received was a monumental swindle.


Illuminati - The Music Industry Exposed [Full Length] 2012